tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2787283052819380346.post4771694702110097775..comments2008-09-06T15:21:51.748+01:00Harry Colehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05099597763862011749noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2787283052819380346.post-56916546724099226412008-09-06T15:16:00.000+01:002008-09-06T15:16:00.000+01:00Why the hell is this addressed to me as well as you?Christianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12813595031543071453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2787283052819380346.post-80975364989213957222008-09-04T07:36:00.000+01:002008-09-04T07:36:00.000+01:00Personally, if the matter had been kept at "The NME can't disclose anything until it's been past the party board, but there could be a shake-up devolving more power to areas, it's just that at present we're not 100% certain in which form it will follow." I think that the matter could/would have been held off until such a time that whatever it was/may be could be announced. <BR/><BR/>With the notion of regional coordinators, I like it - to a point. Having a regional rep on the NME would work - as long as branches could form their own area committee as a sub-region.Richard Lowehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03660059882015513466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2787283052819380346.post-63817680527677919622008-09-04T01:23:00.000+01:002008-09-04T01:23:00.000+01:00Regardless of whether the reforms are right or wrong it has become clear that the NME were intending to consult the membership once they had discussed exactly what it was they were proposing. However, seeing as the reforms were leaked, I think a statement should have been issued weeks ago when this actually happened rather than leaving it hanging weeks later after huge amounts of rumours and speculation. Whatever the NME are planning wouldn't it be better for them to lay out their plans so far for the membership to see?Alexandra Swannnoreply@blogger.com